Emissions

Translate

en English af Afrikaans sq Albanian ar Arabic hy Armenian az Azerbaijani eu Basque be Belarusian bg Bulgarian ca Catalan zh-CN Chinese (Simplified) zh-TW Chinese (Traditional) hr Croatian cs Czech da Danish nl Dutch et Estonian tl Filipino fi Finnish fr French gl Galician ka Georgian de German el Greek ht Haitian Creole iw Hebrew hi Hindi hu Hungarian is Icelandic id Indonesian ga Irish it Italian ja Japanese ko Korean lv Latvian lt Lithuanian mk Macedonian ms Malay mt Maltese no Norwegian fa Persian pl Polish pt Portuguese ro Romanian ru Russian sr Serbian sk Slovak sl Slovenian es Spanish sw Swahili sv Swedish th Thai tr Turkish uk Ukrainian ur Urdu vi Vietnamese cy Welsh yi Yiddish
Open Translation
 
WASHINGTON, DC: Bryan Comer leads the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) marine programme - dedicated to providing policymakers with the data and analysis they need to avoid, reduce, and eliminate pollution from the global shipping sector. He suggests conventionally powered cruise ships actually emit more CO2 per passenger than airlines:

 
Cruising is a way to visit some of the most pristine and spectacular places on earth, and we hear a lot about how flying is bad for the climate, right? Right. But what if I told you that even the most efficient cruise ships emit more carbon dioxide per passenger kilometer (CO2/pax-km) than a passenger jet?

How do the CO2 emissions from cruising compare with those from flying? In our global shipping emissions inventory, we found that the world’s largest and most efficient cruise ships emit about 250 gCO2/pax-km. Based on the data in ICCT’s most recent transatlantic aircraft emissions inventory, the industry average carbon intensity ranges from approximately 10 gCO2/pax-km to 130 gCO2/pax-km, with longer flights tending to have lower carbon intensity. At 2,000 km, the average carbon intensity is approximately 80 gCO2/pax-km.

This is for CO2 only. Counting the climate impacts of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) like methane, black carbon, and especially persistent contrails from aircraft would change the math. While still uncertain, scientists’ best estimate is that the total (CO2 plus SLCPs) climate impact of flying is about three times that of CO2 alone. But cruise ships also emit SLCPs, especially methane, and for simplicity here we’ll compare only CO2 emissions in our cruise-ships-versus-airplanes analysis.

Cruise ships double as floating hotels, so it’s only fair to also consider emissions from hotel stays for those who fly. According to a 2021 tool from Cornell, a 1-night stay in a 4-star hotel in the United States results in about 30 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (kgCO2e) per room per night. If we assume there are two people per room, we can cut that in half. It’s even lower for less fancy hotels. For simplicity, let’s assume that CO2e = CO2. So, if one person goes on a 5-night cruise that covers 2,000 km, at 250 gCO2/pax-km (the most efficient cruise ship line) that passenger is responsible for 500 kgCO2. The same person flying by jet would emit 160 kgCO2 on an average airline. Adding in the hotel emissions means an extra 15 kgCO2 per night, so 75 kgCO2, and the total is 235 kgCO2. In this example, even accounting for emissions from an equivalent-night hotel stay at a 4-star U.S. hotel, a passenger on a cruise ship emits about two times more CO2 than someone who flies and rents a hotel.

I know I said we’re leaving out methane, but it’s important to know that new cruise ships are increasingly opting for methane as fuel, in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Clarksons estimates that, by gross tonnage, half of new cruise ships being built today are designed to run on LNG. While this reduces direct air pollution emissions, the types of engines that cruise ships use leak unburned methane into the atmosphere. This is called “methane slip” and the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from these engines end up being higher than using low-sulfur marine gas oil, according to our research. To look into this more, the ICCT, in partnership with Explicit ApS and TNO, recently launched the FUgitive Methane Emissions from Ships (FUMES) project, and we’ll be measuring real-world methane emissions from LNG-fueled ships, including cruise ships. We expect to publish the results next year.

For those cruise ships that don’t run on LNG, many are currently using scrubbers that reroute pollution from the air into the water. The scrubber discharge water is contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals which have been linked to cancers and reproductive dysfunction in marine mammals. All this so that cruise ships can continue to use cheaper high-sulfur heavy fuel oil instead of more expensive low-sulfur fuels to comply with the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) fuel sulfur regulations. Unfortunately, we estimate that using scrubbers results in higher direct and life-cycle CO2 emissions than using marine gas oil, as well as higher particulate matter emissions, including of climate-warming black carbon.

So, how can the climate impacts of cruising be reduced? Let’s start with some baby steps. First, cruise ships should stop using scrubbers and instead use low-sulfur marine gas oil at all times, or at least while the ship is in or near ports, estuaries, harbors, Marine Protected Areas, and Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs). This is critically important for PSSAs containing coral reefs, as they are already suffering the ill effects of ocean acidification and a warming climate. Second, all cruise ships that have shore power connections should plug in whenever it’s available, and ships without shore power connections should install them. Third, cruise companies should stop ordering LNG-powered cruise ships and instead start investing in ships that use non-methane alternative fuels, such as green methanol or even green hydrogen. One cruise ship is already testing a hydrogen fuel cell using methanol as the hydrogen source, although it gets most of its power from LNG engines. New cruise ships should be capable of running on non-methane fuels such as methanol, with at least a portion of their power from hydrogen fuel cells, batteries, and wind-assisted propulsion, and all new cruise ships should be equipped with shore power connections.

Ultimately, mandatory, enforceable regulations will be needed to ensure that the cruise industry invests in ships powered by zero-life-cycle-emissions fuels and energy. California already requires cruise ships to use shore power, and the Port of Vancouver has banned the use of scrubbers by ships at berth or at anchor, including cruise ships. Meanwhile, the IMO is developing regulations aimed at phasing out GHG emissions from international shipping, including cruising. However, these regulations are currently too weak to stop global GHG emissions from the sector from growing, and strengthening them will require years of negotiations among IMO member states and observer organizations, including the cruise industry, which has its own IMO delegation.

In the meantime, regions such as the European Union are implementing their own regulations that require the life-cycle GHG intensity of marine fuels to fall over time, starting in 2025. Also, starting in 2023, the European Union will begin charging ships for their carbon pollution through its Emissions Trading Scheme. The effects of regulation will take time to realize. In the meantime, the industry should take it upon itself to abandon the use of scrubbers, use marine gas oil whenever possible, test out fuels that have low or zero life-cycle emissions, invest in zero-emission technologies including shore power, batteries, fuel cells, and wind-assisted propulsion, and show that it can be a leader in decarbonizing the global shipping sector. Otherwise, it’s hard to justify a summer cruise if you know that it’s worse than flying.

P.S. To those who have already booked their tickets, maybe reconsider this year’s voyage to the North Pole in this LNG-powered ice-breaking cruise ship: https://us.ponant.com/le-commandant-charcot

 
The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) is an independent nonprofit organization providing technical and scientific analysis to environmental regulators. Comer is a lead author of the Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study and is an expert on Arctic shipping issues. His work highlights how maritime transportation can transition away from fossil-fueled ships to zero-emission vessels.
 
Story Type: Comment

Vote for my Story

Our Rating: 9% - 1 votes

1000 Characters left


November 28, 2023
Emissions Editor

You can’t have it both ways IEA tells oil and gas companies

PARIS: The International Energy Agency (IEA) says the oil and gas sector - including COP 28 president and simultaneously CEO of the Abu Dhabi Oil Company (ADNOC) Sultan Al Jaber - is faced with taking responsibility for a worsening climate crisis or…
November 20, 2023
Emissions Editor

UN warns governments: cut emissions now or face global warming of 2.5˚C-2.9°C

NEW YORK/NAIROBI: The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) says the lack of government action to reduce global warming is leading to a 2.5˚C-2.9°C rise in temperatures above pre-industrial levels this century. The latest UN Emissions Gap Report provides an annual,…
November 17, 2023
Emissions Editor

The hottest 12 months in recorded history

PRINCETON, NJ: In a prelude to COP28, a report by Climate Central scientists estimate that the global average temperature between November 1, 2022 and October 31, 2023 was 1.32°C above the pre-industrial baseline – the hottest 12 months in recorded history.…
November 06, 2023
Emissions Editor

MSC Group orders two hydrogen-powered ships

GENEVA: MSC Group cruise subsidiary Explora Journeys has ordered two auxilary hydrogen-powered ships from Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri. The deal completes a total investment of €3.5 billion for six vessels delivered by 2028. The two ships will also be…
November 03, 2023
Emissions Editor

European shipping industry emissions increase

BRUSSELS: Based on reported data, European shipping emissions increased three percent in 2022 to 135 million tonnes of CO2, an all time high. The number of ships calling at European ports grew from 12,211 in 2021 to 12,953 in 2022. Swiss-based MSC, the…
October 24, 2023
Emissions Editor

No stopping melting West Antarctic Ice Sheet

CAMBRIDGE, UK: British Antarctic Survey (BAS) research published this week says the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) cannot be stopped from melting no matter how much humans reduce or eliminate fossil fuel emissions. As a result, Antarctica’s contribution to…
September 06, 2023
Emissions Editor

Maersk signs another green fuel deal with Amazon

FLORHAM PARK, NJ: Maersk and Amazon have agreed to ship containers using low GHG fuel options for a fourth consecutive year. The 2023-2024 deal covers the delivery of 20,000 FFE (40ft-equivalent) containers using green biofuel Maersk says will cut emissions…
August 22, 2023
Emissions Editor

Hapag-Lloyd helps DB Schenker decarbonise supply chains

HAMBURG: DB Schenker and Hapag-Lloyd have signed an agreement for emission-reduced maritime container transport powered by 1,000 tones of pure waste- and residue-based biofuel. By the end of 2023, the logistics division of Deutsche Bahn expects to avoid…
August 21, 2023
Emissions Editor

Maritime industry fails to agree on Paris emissions target

LONDON: At a meeting in July, the 175 members of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) failed to align global shipping with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C temperature-warming limit. Instead of agreeing absolute emission reduction targets by 2030 and…
May 18, 2022
Emissions Editor

Microsoft cash produces more emissions than the manufacturing, transport and use of its products

WASHINGTON, DC: A new report has revealed how the banking sector uses client cash to finance fossil fuels while undermining the sustainability efforts of climate-conscious companies including Google, Meta and PayPal. ‘The Carbon Bankroll: The Climate Impact…
May 13, 2022
Emissions Editor

Climate crisis worsens despite corporate promises

GENEVA/LONDON: A report from the UN World Meteorological Organization (WMO) says it’s likely the annual average global temperature will reach 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels at least once in the next five years. The odds of exceeding the Paris Agreement…
April 04, 2022
Emissions Editor

"Damning litany of broken climate promises”

NEW YORK: ‘Climate Change 2022’, the third part of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report, has been published today following approval by 195 governments. In a video commentary, UN secretary-general António Guterres…

We are using cookies

By continuing you are agreeing to our use of cookies

I understand