en English af Afrikaans sq Albanian ar Arabic hy Armenian az Azerbaijani eu Basque be Belarusian bg Bulgarian ca Catalan zh-CN Chinese (Simplified) zh-TW Chinese (Traditional) hr Croatian cs Czech da Danish nl Dutch et Estonian tl Filipino fi Finnish fr French gl Galician ka Georgian de German el Greek ht Haitian Creole iw Hebrew hi Hindi hu Hungarian is Icelandic id Indonesian ga Irish it Italian ja Japanese ko Korean lv Latvian lt Lithuanian mk Macedonian ms Malay mt Maltese no Norwegian fa Persian pl Polish pt Portuguese ro Romanian ru Russian sr Serbian sk Slovak sl Slovenian es Spanish sw Swahili sv Swedish th Thai tr Turkish uk Ukrainian ur Urdu vi Vietnamese cy Welsh yi Yiddish
Open Translation

LONDON: Governments are subsidising the destruction of the earth’s ecosystems by companies to the tune of US$1.8 trillion annually, according to research commissioned by The B Team and Business for Nature.

The first study in over a decade to put a value on environmentally harmful subsidies (EHS), finds the fossil fuel, agriculture and water industries receive US$1.5 trillion a year to maintain unsustainable levels of production and consumption.

Other subsidised sectors include forestry (US$155 billion); construction, (US$90 billion); transport (US$85 billion); and marine capture fisheries (US$50 billion).

The report describes how redirecting, repurposing, or eliminating subsidies would help unlock the US$711 billion required each year to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030, as well as the cost of reaching net-zero emissions.

The total value of EHS is likely to be higher than US$1.8 trillion because of a lack of transparency between governments and recipients, adds the study, thereby creating major risks for businesses and investors by distorting investment patterns and industry cost structures, masking operating or accident risks, and creating competitive barriers to environmental improvements.

Despite committing over a decade ago to phase out or reform harmful subsidies, governments of 190 countries have failed to do so. And while 141 world leaders pledged to “halt and reverse forest loss and land degradation by 2030” at the UNFCCC COP26 last year, US$155 billion is still spent on subsidizing unsustainable forest management - encouraging deforestation, a loss of carbon sequestration, and biodiversity loss.

Commenting on the results, former Unilever CEO and co-author of ‘Net Positive’ Paul Polman declared: “Few are aware of the US$1.8 trillion in perverse subsidies dished out by governments globally, which drive environmental degradation, poverty and soon will be the biggest single driver of climate change.

“We’re often told there’s no money to tackle these problems. Yet just a third of the money could be redirected towards making our food system sustainable – the same food system which is otherwise responsible for a third of all greenhouse gas emissions.”

With the UN Convention on Biological Diversity COP15 scheduled to resume March 13-29, The B Team and Business for Nature want the US$500 billion per year target on subsidy reform in the current draft Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) to reflect its latest research, and commit governments to eliminate all environmentally harmful subsidies by 2030.

“Subsidies perpetuate a broken system and perverse incentives,” declared founder and president of the Virgin Foundation Jean Oelwang. “It is absurd that we continue to subsidise the destruction of the planet, and in turn our own destruction. We have an opportunity to courageously join forces to shape a smart transition that will incentivise clean energy and the protection of nature.”
Story Type: News

Vote for my Story

Our Rating: 9% - 1 votes

1000 Characters left

May 05, 2022
Food Editor

Putin’s War reveals fragile food supply chain

WARSAW: An international donor conference has raised US$6.5 billion for humanitarian aid to 7.7 million Ukrainian citizens internally displaced and a further 5.5 million now refugees in other countries. After 10 weeks of Russia’s invasion, a new report from…
February 11, 2022
Food Editor

Louis Dreyfus makes ethical supply chain move

ROTTERDAM: Food commodity trader Louis Dreyfus (LDC) has committed to eliminate deforestation and the conversion of conservation value vegetation for agriculture from all its supply chains by the end of 2025. Founded in 1851 the French company sources,…
January 14, 2022
Food Editor

Unilever to determine we are what we eat

NATICK, MA/LONDON, UK: Unilever has partnered with gut researchers Holobiome to identify food and drink ingredients that could have a positive impact on mental wellbeing. According to Unilever many scientists consider the human gut microbiome, where trillions…
October 06, 2021
Food Editor

Mars links executive compensation to climate action

MCLEAN, VA: Food manufacturer Mars has set a science-based climate target to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 while challenging its 20,000 suppliers to drive change across its full value chain, including Scope 3 emissions. The company…
September 15, 2021
Food Editor

Too Good to Go takes off with SWISS

GENEVA: SWISS is collaborating with Too Good To Go, the food app that connects consumers with food that would otherwise be thrown away. Founded in Copenhagen in 2015, the Certified B Corp says it has since saved 348 million pounds of food, the equivalent of…
August 03, 2021
Food Editor

Time to reduce the US$20 trillion hidden cost of food

ROME: Former head of TNT, now owned by FedEx, Peter Bakker has been president and CEO of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) since 2012. Speaking in advance of the UN Food System Summit in September, he says there is an urgent need…
July 30, 2021
Food Editor

A billion tons of food wasted as another 100 million people go hungry

ANTANANARIVO, Madagascar: The World Food Programme (WFP) says over 500,000 children are facing irreversible damage to their growth after four years of drought in southern Madagascar caused by human-induced climate change. “While we are rushing to space, 41…
July 22, 2021
Food Editor

Driven to waste - the global impact of food loss

NAIROBI/LONDON: A report by WWF and the UK supermarket chain Tesco says 40 percent of all food is wasted while emitting 10 percent of global greenhouse gases (GHG). WWF Media officer Lilian Gikandi says there’s a better solution to wasting 2.5 billion tonnes…
June 22, 2021
Food Editor

OECD says food subsidies don't help and cost US$720 billion a year

PARIS: The OECD says governments provided an average US$720 billion in annual agriculture subsidies between 2018-20, including US$338 billion that was market distorting, inequitable and harmful to both the environment and global food security. Of 54 countries…
May 06, 2021
Food Editor

Last year was even worse for those at the bottom of the food chain

ROME: The World Food Programme says 155 million people across 55 countries face acute food insecurity caused by conflict, extreme weather and economic shocks from COVID-19. The number hit a five-year high in 2020 according to the latest annual report by the…
April 05, 2021
Food Editor

Food supply chains responsible for 29 percent of man-made GHG emissions

ISPRA/ROME, Italy: A paper published in Nature Food this month says supply chains are responsible for 29 percent of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the global food sector. In 2015 food systems produced 18 Gigatonnes of GHG emissions, some 34 percent of the…
March 10, 2021
Food Editor

Food systems produce more than a third of global GHG emissions

ROME: A study for the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the European Commission's Joint Research Centre says the world's food systems are responsible for more than a third of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Ranging from…

We are using cookies

By continuing you are agreeing to our use of cookies

I understand